Search for: "In re: Davis v."
Results 61 - 80
of 1,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
” Anne Davis v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
” Anne Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 2:04 pm
Thaler v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
No application was made to vacate the hearing and re-list it after the proceedings had been regularised in that way. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
While the court didn’t mention the yet-to-be-argued Warhol v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Davis held that a criminal penalty for using a firearm during a "crime of violence" was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:11 pm
We’re ready to answer your questions and provide you with the legal help you need. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Davis a draft of the complaint, to which Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Supreme Court case Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 23 June 2023 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Dube v Warwick. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The recent In re Edgio, Inc. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:27 am
Supreme Court case of Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
Below are eight major cases that together help to tell the story of how the Court evaluated—and re-evaulated—these questions over time: Dred Scott v. [read post]
