Search for: "In re: Energy Future Holdings v."
Results 61 - 80
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
Whether you're for or against re-licensing Indian Point and our nation's aging nuclear power plants, the security of our residents who live in the areas that surround these facilities is paramount. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
So they're willing to say that it was worth multimillion [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Anglin Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm
Anglin Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Bilski v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
Patentable foods: The "Impossible" and the eggless | Advertisement distributed by Swedish ISP held to be sexually discriminatory | Italian Supreme Court holds that an unauthorized derivative work may be both infringing and protectable | CJEU weighs on liability of owner of internet connection used to infringe copyright | GCC diplomaticcrisis update: Qatar’s new request for consultation with Saudi to address IPviolations | Brexit and Brands Part 4 | Blockchain and… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm
Neapco Holdings LLC, et al., No. 20-891 (CVSG requested May 3, 2021); Res Judicata and the Patent-Specific Kessler Doctrine: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
Due Diligence: Unclear Destination Such developments hold great promise. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
BAAQMD (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, holding that, as a general rule, CEQA does not require an effect of the existing environment on a project’s future occupants or users, the court held that BAAQMD’s receptor thresholds could not be used to evaluate effects on future users, because to do so could trigger the need to prepare an EIR solely because the emissions in the existing environment meet the thresholds as to future users. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
During the subsequent evidentiary hearing, witnesses for the applicant conceded that the wind generators who played a crucial part in its energy and financial simulation models don’t actually exist yet; they’re based on projections. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
Because of the open questions that remain, future cases will be closely watched and studied for clarification and application of the Court’s holdings. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
, In re Paradigm Capital Management, and we certainly expect to see more such cases brought by the Commission in the near future. [read post]
