Search for: "In re: Late Fee & Over-Limit Fee Litigation" Results 61 - 80 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am by Brielle A. Basso
” The court further ordered that, pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1), the plaintiff’s counsel was required to pay all of the defendants’ reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred in connection with the limited depositions. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am by Brielle A. Basso
” The court further ordered that, pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1), the plaintiff’s counsel was required to pay all of the defendants’ reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred in connection with the limited depositions. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am by Brielle A. Basso
” The court further ordered that, pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1), the plaintiff’s counsel was required to pay all of the defendants’ reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred in connection with the limited depositions. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
At the same time the parties will not be re-litigating the same patents in subsequent actions over several more years. [read post]
It allows a person or class who suffers an injury due to a violation to bring a civil action in federal court but imposes a four-year delay until the PRA kicks in; bans mandatory arbitration clauses for minors only; and limits relief to compensatory damages, injunctions, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm by MOTP
In the latter case, the minimum payment will typically consist of a percentage of the revolving balance and current finance charges, which may include other charges (such as a late fee or over-limit fee) in addition to the newly accrued interest and any past-due amount. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
Further, the record showed that Houle's account was past due for six consecutive months, from January 2013-June 2013, with an annual percentage rate of 29.40%, incurred past due and over limit fees, and was thereafter "charged off," with a final balance of $4007.72. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
Further, if the fee were payable to the lawyer immediately after the funds were raised, it could be considered a non-refundable retainer that could amount to an excessive fee that would limit the client’s ability to seek other counsel if they were unsatisfied with the attorney’s performance. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:03 pm
Duty Of Disclosure: Delaware Chancellor Further Limits Availability of Damages From Travis Laster: Last week, Delaware Chancellor Chandler - in In re Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. - granted summary judgment in favor of three directors who were alleged to have breached their fiduciary duties by supporting and voting in favor of the acquisition of Transkaryotic Therapies by Shire Pharmaceuticals. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:46 am
The bottom line is that these are cases where the lawyer only has control over his conduct, having limited control over his client, and virtually none over the opposing party or his lawyer. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Of course, the opt-out claimants also get the res judicata benefits of the Judge Swain’s dismissal motion ruling as well. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:08 am
 If you don't think you're going to be able to prove it, don't plead it in the first place.In relation to Registered Designs, Judge Hacon wanted to see similar limitations. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:40 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
If you’re reading this and thinking that defense counsel did too little too late, then you have identified the crux of this appeal: ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:46 pm by Bexis
In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 671 F. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:30 pm by Ann Pearson
I got certified in the first beta group, which was, late 2010, early 2011. [read post]