Search for: "In re: The Exxon Valdez." Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
The construct was reinforced by understandable media emphasis on large awards and further fueled by experimental research, never reconciled with realworld data (Eisenberg et al. 2002), funded by ExxonMobil Corporation (Sunstein et al. 2002) to mitigate Exxon's liability related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Supreme Court’s ruling in the Exxon Valdez case which defined “recklessness”. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:18 pm by Brian Huddleston
He insisted over and over again the federal government is in charge and they`re doing everything humanly possible to respond to this disaster. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:01 am by Greenberg & Bederman
Probably because they know all too well that occasionally, there will be an Exxon Valdez. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:30 am by nothoney
“Clearly we didn’t learn anything from Exxon Valdez. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Jack Becker
For some high profile examples, investigators found that sleep deprivation played significant roles in: the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, the Challenger Space Shuttle explosion, the Exxon Valdez oil spill, and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Bush, Bill was Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and his tenure encompassed the Exxon Valdez disaster. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:29 am
  You're inheriting some kind of global warming problem and we're still trying to clean up those 11 million gallons of crude oil we dumped in Alaska from the Exxon Valdez. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Under current law -- the Clean Water Act as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, following the Exxon Valdez disaster -- a company that spills oil is subject to fines up to $1,000 per barrel, or up to $3,000 per barrel in the case of gross negligence. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
"      In response to the Republicans, Jim Manley, spokesman for Senator Reid, released a statement saying, "Republicans want taxpayers to foot the bill for BP's disaster and allow BP to use endless legal battles to run out the clock on those whose livelihoods they destroyed -- just like Exxon did to victims of the Valdez spill. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am by Pace Law School Library
Economic loss, punitive damages, and the Exxon Valdez litigation. 45 Ga. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:34 pm
Readers found hundreds of self-serving edits and revisionist cuts by the likes of Diebold, Dow Chemical and ExxonMobil -- the latter tweaked the entry on the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to whitewash the effect on Alaskan wildlife. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:13 am by Chip Merlin
The article noted: The claims-adjusting blog Dimechimes ClaimSmentor was one online source that on June 7 mentioned a rumor that BP had instructed ESIS, the oil company's TPA for Deepwater Horizon oil spill damage, not to hire any adjusters with experience resolving claims from the Exxon Valdez oil spill of March 1989. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
The Class Actions Post-Concepcion: A Defining Moment in American Jurisprudence Whatever happened to state’s rights, Justice Scalia? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by Mandelman
 In other words… it’s an oil spill… perhaps the worst oil spill of which the world has ever conceived… the Exxon Valdez meets Deepwater Horizon x 100, if you will… but it’s still just an oil spill. [read post]