Search for: "In re Adoption of Goldberg"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
We’re two-thirds of the way through the official winter season, which thus far has dumped a lot of snow on the Northeast making it a good one for skiers. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:14 pm
Probably due to the amendment to the UCC, “in the more than 50 years since Goldberg was decided, no New York state court has adopted [its] ‘thing of danger’ exception or followed a similar approach in purely economic loss cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:53 am
And then we’re right back to the crux of the problem. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:03 pm
President Xi is also expected to announce plans for China to adopt a cap and trade system that was agreed on last night. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
Goldberg v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Goldberg of Columbia Law School and Pamela S. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
Nevada largely adopted Washington’s Anti-SLAPP law, with a few local tweaks. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:08 am
This view was adopted in ABA Formal Opinion 94-380 and reflected in Goldberg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
The re-hearing took place on December 15, 2014 (oral argument available here) and the decision of the full court is still outstanding. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
The reason is plain: they’re effective tools of persuasion, and utterly wrong. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
[Earlier contributions to this symposium came from: John Neiman, Dale Carpenter, Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge, Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
There’s some editing, updated citations, re-circulation among the judges, and perhaps rethinking that need to go into a draft opinion at this point. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am
Yes, that’s the result that the Swami, Kevin Goldberg, had predicted. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 pm
They’re mostly just judging. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Such decisions have closed the door to all “Rube Goldberg-like contrivances” (Pet. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Kay, 2014 ONSC 321 (CanLII) http://t.co/PUEQlK73by -> Microsoft suit against Ebix allowed to proceed http://t.co/ggiw9oc8Kr -> Music Remains – A Recorded Music Rube Goldberg Machine http://t.co/BqNtx0nh3w -> Production Orders and Electronic Information http://t.co/HP6lKbwRs8 -> The SCC Narrows the Scope of the Tort of Unlawful Interference With Economic Relations http://t.co/08AohNXKAW -> Jim Balsillie advocates strengthening IP rights http://t.co/RBHwMAwOPo ->… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
Ditch the “Rube Goldberg” public performance interpretation What this means for FilmOn X (and, by extension, Aereo) is that it would be liable for publicly performing, even under its own interpretation of the public performance provisions. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
It does a great job demonstrating that the interplay between the First Amendment and the publicity rights is completely anarchy, which isn't surprising given that we don't really understand what we're trying to accomplish with the publicity rights doctrines in the first place. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Keep eye on what you’re trying to achieve. [read post]
