Search for: "In re Appeal of Visser"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:12 am
That being said, the current situation post Brexit might offer a unique opportunity to re-think the entire EU patent strategy and the UPCA project a bit more generally. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Overview of the Appeal Proceedings according to the EPC, Third Edition by Hugo Meinders, Philipp Lanz, Gérard Weiss€ 95 Global Patent… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
Insbesondere im zweiten Fall wäre bis zur Herausbildung einer einheitlichen Handhabung der verschiedenen Kammern von gravierender Rechtsunsicherheit auszugehen und es stellten sich nicht unerhebliche organisatorische Probleme. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am
Future topics lined up for harmonisation over the coming years include the accordance of a priority date, re-establishment of rights, claim drafting and structure, and computer-implemented inventions. 4. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:55 am
’ You’re based in London. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm
The patentees sued on the day of grant, had a trial within one year and the appeal within the next year. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 8:55 am
Fourth, the EPO Boards of Appeal remain competent as is. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
An appeal is available to the seized party (art. 60.6). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:24 am
Fee for re-establishment of rights/fee for requesting restoration/fee for reinstatement of rights 685 720 750 30 4.2% 14. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
Camille Lignières and Ms. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:19 am
Then the management thinks: we’re not going there because that’s already blocked. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Grynberg: courts of appeals are much more comfortable with district courts making those kinds of calls than w/agencies. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:17 pm
And, finally, the EPO has recently published the Annual Report on the Boards of Appeal 2018, which also gives cause for a few comments. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:31 am
The aim of my work was (and is still), essentially, to insist on the need to (re)take the right road, despite what I like to call “the DABUS Joke”. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
The aim of my work was (and is still), essentially, to insist on the need to (re)take the right road, despite what I like to call “the DABUS Joke”. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
The judge notes that “these are familiar concepts” but by way of re-familiarisation: in this case the comparables case involved looking at the SEP licences which the patentee (InterDigital) had previously agreed with other implementers, whilst the top-down approach is an alternative method of cross-checking the rate derived by the comparable licence approach. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:43 am
An appeal is available to the seized party (art. 60.6). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
The judge notes that “these are familiar concepts” but by way of re-familiarisation: in this case the comparables case involved looking at the SEP licences which the patentee (InterDigital) had previously agreed with other implementers, whilst the top-down approach is an alternative method of cross-checking the rate derived by the comparable licence approach. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am
In addition to the practical organization, this provision still raises many questions that were discussed in our article of 10 October 2018[8], concerning in particular the appeal procedure against decision of the Director of the INPI ruling on opposition: Will the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal ruling on opposition (this Court being competent to examine appeals against the decisions of the Director of the INPI) have res judicata and/or impose an… [read post]
