Search for: "In re Appeal of Visser" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 11:28 am by Bart van Wezenbeek
Bart van WezenbeekA request for re-establishment should be filed within two months of the date of removal of non-compliance. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:33 am by John Collins
John Collins and Sumer DayalOn 5 July 2019, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) handed down its judgment in the appeal and cross-appeal in Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2019] FCAFC 115. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
What has interested me for this blog is how the European standard for re-establishment, i.e. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
In addition to the practical organization, this provision still raises many questions that were discussed in our article of 10 October 2018[8], concerning in particular the appeal procedure against decision of the Director of the INPI ruling on opposition: Will the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal ruling on opposition (this Court being competent to examine appeals against the decisions of the Director of the INPI) have res judicata and/or impose an… [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:17 pm by Thorsten Bausch
And, finally, the EPO has recently published the Annual Report on the Boards of Appeal 2018, which also gives cause for a few comments. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Among other subjects, the right to strike will be re-discussed in this exercise. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
Insbesondere im zweiten Fall wäre bis zur Herausbildung einer einheitlichen Handhabung der verschiedenen Kammern von gravierender Rechtsunsicherheit auszugehen und es stellten sich nicht unerhebliche organisatorische Probleme. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Philipp Widera
The Dusseldorf Court of Appeal in its judgment of March 2018 re Dexmedetomidine confirmed this reasoning without having to further elaborate on what is meant by “sufficient extent of use”. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:10 pm by Hui Zhang
Currently, the Beijing IP Court holds exclusive jurisdiction over appeals of administrative decisions on patent validity and re-examination made by the PRB (Patent Re-examination Board) of the State IP Office and its judgment could be further appealed to the Beijing High Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3:  The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Grynberg: courts of appeals are much more comfortable with district courts making those kinds of calls than w/agencies. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  More appealing to think of modern TM law as: the subject is the TM, searching for consumers. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:51 am
We have had to shed a history of separate national trade mark cultures in order to adopt a new order, and we're getting there, he said. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As an auxiliary request, it requestd that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): “In which way should the term “pending” in R 25(1) EPC 1973 (now R 36(1) EPC) be interpreted for the case where the parent application has been deemed to be withdrawn but a request for re-establishment of rights was filed and a relevant appeal was pending at the time of filing of the divisional application? [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this case a request for re-establishment of rights had been filed but the Board decided that this request was superfluous. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
 The Court of Appeal will continue to hear ARB's appeal on the merits of the Superior Court's final order. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
 The Court of Appeal will continue to hear ARB's appeal on the merits of the Superior Court's final order. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
According to the Board of Appeal, the stumbling block here was prior art relating to the use of cookies -- which the US Patent and Trademark Office had not considered in its own re-examination proceedings. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 Later that same day the IPKat's benefactor Dirk Visser furnished a second English translation -- this time of another case that ran on much the same lines but was somewhat more complex. [read post]