Search for: "In re Application of Jones"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
The applicants argued, in part, that VW waived the privilege over Jones Day’s investigative documents by disclosing privileged material to the DOJ. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 1:36 pm
Goldberg Jones is proud to announce that The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization has named attorney Joseph P. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:38 am
Jones Investment Co., 75 USPQ2d 1313 (TTAB 2005) (NORTON MCNAUGHTON ESSENTIALS allowed to register despite opposition from owner of ESSENTIALS). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
Jones submitted four articles noting the growing trend of restaurant-distilleries selling packaged spirits under the same name or brand as the restaurant portion of the business. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:52 am
Supreme Court SerVaas Incorporated v Rafidian Bank & Ors [2012] UKSC 40 (17 August 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Davis & Anor v West Sussex County Council [2012] EWHC 2152 (QB) (22 August 2012) Jones v Link Financial Ltd [2012] EWHC 2402 (QB) (22 August 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Hughes v Weiss Re Iuvus Ltd [2012] EWHC 2363 (Ch) (15 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Camelot UK Lotteries Ltd, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:59 am
The post The Types of Lawyers Your Business Might Need appeared first on Parks & Jones. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:40 am
The post The Types of Lawyers Your Business Might Need appeared first on Parks & Jones. [read post]
21 May 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed in his March 11, 2013 opinion (here), Judge Jones determined that the “single claim” deeming term operates only with respect to the policy’s claims made provisions, but did not operate with respect to the application of the policy’s exclusions. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:16 pm
Jones Investment Co., 75 USPQ2d 1313 (TTAB 2005) [TTABlogged here], the Board found that addition of the house mark NORTON MCNAUGHTON to the "highly suggestive" registered mark ESSENTIALS for clothing was sufficient to avoid confusion. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend.A quick re-cap of the facts. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
In both Jones and Riley, the Supreme Court re-evaluated long held assumptions in light of new technological developments. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:31 pm
See Application of Sarett, 327 F.2d 1005, 1016 (C.C.P.A. 1964) (reversing rejections for obviousness-type double patenting because generic and specific claims may nonetheless be patently distinct); see generally In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 350 (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:00 pm
So, without further ado, lets turn to Regent Management Ltd v Jones [2010] UKUT 369 (LC), a service charge appeal to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:00 pm
So, without further ado, lets turn to Regent Management Ltd v Jones [2010] UKUT 369 (LC), a service charge appeal to the Upper Tribunal. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm
This was an application for stay of warrant on a rent arrears possession proceeding. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:03 pm
They're in financial trouble at least in part because of a job loss. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm
They're in financial trouble at least in part because of a job loss. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:04 am
In re: C.D. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:13 am
"You're kind of damned if you do, and damned if you don't. [read post]
