Search for: "In re Application of Rodgers"
Results 61 - 80
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 9:56 am
Not the bread and butter fodder of this particular blog, but nevertheless an increasingly important addition to the celebrity arsenal in actions in the field of privacy – as seen, for example, from the comments of Lord Rodger in Re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 at [22], who noted that there had been a “recent efflorescence of anonymity orders” on the back of such actions. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
After hearing arguments Tugendhat J approved the terms of the draft order with one important exception: he refused the claimant’s application to continue the anonymity order. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
After hearing arguments Tugendhat J approved the terms of the draft order with one important exception: he refused the claimant’s application to continue the anonymity order. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
‘A lot’, the press would answer” – these were the memorable words of Lord Rodger in the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 [63]. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
As recently as January 2010, Lord Rodger stated in In re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 that on the existing Strasbourg case law, a right to obtain any information which would not be otherwise available to a person “is not within the scope of Article 10(1)”. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm
Hsiao, under the guidance of Professor Nicholas RobinsonPoliticsSJD dissertation on public participation in South and North Korean environmental laws] / Byungchun So, Pace University School of LawRisk AnalysisThe application of the precautionary principle in practice : comparative dimensions / Joakim ZanderSciencePrinciples of environmental sciences / edited by Jan J. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
’ The court [in Re Guardian News & Media] emphasised that the answer will depend on the facts of the particular case. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm
In R A, Re Judicial Review [2010] NIQB 27, the desired extension to an anonymity order was refused on the grounds that the applicant’s name had been disclosed earlier in proceedings. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Rachel Rodgers This was a very informative class Trippe and very applicable to solo practitioners who represent businesses…. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
The imams then said that they were going to re-examine the order of custody in favor of Rola and also going to re-examine the applicability of the dowry agreement -- so Rola had custody of the kids at risk again, and Jamal was at risk of having to pay more money to Rola again.No one is happy with this, so they went back to the Texas courts with a dispute about the scope of the "Islamic Arbitration Agreement," which found its way to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37 On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
” [74] The application of the Leander principle to Court proceedings in England and Wales was considered in Re Guardian News and Media Limited ([2010] 2 WLR 325 at [34]). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
However, much of the Judgment of the Court is orthodox and of continuing application and importance. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
But he added: "An applicant would not be considered for the period of his disqualification. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
Silih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37 – Read judgment, McCaughey and Quinn’s Application [2010] NICA 13 – Read judgment This is Part I of Matthew Hill’s feature. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The judgment was given by Lord Rodger. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
Supreme Court judge Lord Rodger said gay people’s right to live freely must be protected. [read post]
