Search for: "In re Eadie" Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 10:58 am
They're about power and the proletariat. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Lord Neuberger then considered the press’ interest in knowing the identity of anonymous authors and quoted Lord Rodger in In re Guardian and Media Ltd & Ors [2010] UKSC 1: “What’s in a name? [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am by INFORRM
In OPQ v BJM & CJM ([2011] EWHC 1059) where the Defendants were seeking to sell intimate photographs of the Claimant to the newspapers and which Mr Justice Eady described as a “straight forward and blatant blackmail case”, the judge appeared to go even further and consider the Article 8 rights of the Applicant’s family members themselves: “There is also evidence as to the likely adverse impact of publicity on the health and wellbeing of various members of the… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Russia: The Duma has passed a law re-criminalising defamation – just 6 months after it was decriminalised. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  We also re-posted a discussion of the case from the always thoughtful Law Think blog. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Mr Justice Eady gave a judgment concerning the conduct of the trial in the privacy case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, there was Eady J’s judgment in the case of CTB v News Group Newspapers (No.4) [2011] EWHC 3099 (QB) was made public. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Lawyers have suggested that Eady J and others ‘may be over reaching themselves’. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:05 am by INFORRM
By posting anything, anywhere – however naively, with whatever unrealistic expectations that you’re speaking only to friends – you’re stepping over that invisible line, drawn by newspaper editors, that means you’ve forfeited any right to privacy. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Organisations should re-evaluate their data export strategy to take this into account. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 3 November 2016, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the libel damages assessment of Undre v London Borough of Harrow ([2016] EWHC 2761 (QB)). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
If your boss is bullying you, it’s not because ‘that’s how nationals work’ or ‘you’re in the big leagues now‘. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
” This passage is substantially similar to paragraph 50 in the first instance decision by Eady J in McKennitt v Ash which was approved by the Court of Appeal in that case in December 2006. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
The case of McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth was settled just before the commencement of a 20 day trial by Eady J. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency project discusses the Re X judgment and the issue of transparency versus confidentiality. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Gary Dobson and David Norris were found guilty of the murder of Stephen Lawrence, prompting the Daily Mail to re-publish a new version of its famous “murderers” front page. [read post]