Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 3. OTHERWISE" Results 61 - 80 of 635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
’ In re Ramos, 23 I & N Dec. 336, 338 (BIA 2002) (en banc) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit:  In re Grand Jury Matter #3, 2017 WL 383361 (2017) (per curiam). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
Arizona, 2019) the district court denied the fathers petition for return.At the outset the court noted that ICARA proceedings must be conducted on an expedited basis and should, at least as an aspirational matter, be completed within six weeks of when the petition was filed. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s an excerpt (also see this Cooley blog, which summarizes several HCM rulemaking petitions & initiatives, and this Willis Towers Watson memo about the IAC recommendations): There are a wide range of potentially material HCM disclosures and ways to integrate that information into current reporting. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm by Frodnesor
Notwithstanding the sua sponte opinion in In re Attorneys At Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm by Frodnesor
Notwithstanding the sua sponte opinion in In re Attorneys At Law and Debt Relief Agencies, 332 B.R. 66 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
In-car audio captures the initial questioning, during which Dassey waives his Miranda rights. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
In-car audio captures the initial questioning, during which Dassey waives his Miranda rights. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
“until I die”); however, the periods of reservation were limited initially to 25 years: Re St Kenelm Romsley [2022] ECC Wor 3 and Re St Kenelm Romsley [2022] ECC Wor 4. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
The 5th Circuit soon after withdrew its initial opinion and issued another in its place on August 3, deleting the problematic 4th Amendment ruling while still affirming the conviction on good faith grounds. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
This is because the GAB must now identify and remove suspect signatures on its own initiative. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:59 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
  (In re Marriage of Witherspoon (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 963, 971 [in Convention matters, we review factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo].) [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am by Susan Brenner
  Usher then filed a petition with the Indiana Supreme Court, asking it to review (and presumably reverse) the report. [read post]