Search for: "In re IPR Licensing, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms trifusal of NATIONAL QUICK SALE for Real Estate Services: In re National Real Estate Solutions, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Class 46) How to get the wrong invention searched (Tufty the Cat) Formula One licensing crashes out in TM opposition: Case T-10/09 Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM (IPKat) Mediterranean airlines safe in Luxembourg – General Court confirms no likelihood of confusion in Case T-194/09 Lan Airlines v OHMI – Air Nostrum (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion between Yorma’s and Norma (Class 46) General Court rejects INSULATE FOR LIFE: T-157/08 (Class… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
Affirming 2(d) refusal, TTAB finds confusion likely between BAJA for camping trailers and automobiles: In re Jayco, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of MTS TESTSUITE – Applicant failed to comply with disclaimer requirement: In re MTS Systems Corporation (TTABlog) Why does a subsidiary need a license agreement? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Clariti Eyewear, Inc. (271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC reverses BPAI's claim interpretation: In re Vaidyanathan (Gray on Claims) CAFC affirms claim construction and rejects indefiniteness argument: Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Some very preliminary data (IPKat) (IPKat) Open licensing: the word according to DPat (IPKat) Patent trolls are the good guys... seriously! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
We just want to make sure that it's licensed and you're getting paid. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling the broader… [read post]