Search for: "In re J.J.,J.J.,J.J." Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2007, 1:35 am
It is more relaxed and does give you the good feeling that you're not intruding on anyone. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:24 am by Bill Otis
"But now we're looking at judges, county clerks, prosecutors--even public defenders. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by The A&M Team
nodeId=OKMUCO2010_CH8AN_ARTIINGE_DIV4COCOANOWDOCA_S8-39CODORE Gilchrist, J., Sacks, J.J., White, D., Kresnow, M-J (2008). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
On April 17, 2014, DeviantArt user Surgarteacat notified another user, J.J. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
  Take a look at the Supreme Court’s decision in In re J.J. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Itawamba County School Board Probation Limitations on Internet and Facebook Use Violate First Amendment — In re J.J. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
Let’s take a look at what’s going on in the courts of appeals… In In re J.J., the 6th District rejects the argument that RC 2907.02(A)(1)(c), which prohibits a person from engaging in sexual conduct with another where the victim is substantially impaired, is unconstitutionally vague… In State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
J.J., 2020 BCSC 349 (39133) Is the seven-day notice requirement in s. 278.93(4) constitutional. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:37 am by Venkat Rangan
Relevance feedback as a way to perform information retrieval has been studied for well over forty years, with a paper as early as 1968 by Rocchio J.J., titled Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:05 am by CAPTAIN
Here now is our answer: We think they're a bunch of losers with no heart. [read post]