Search for: "In re Jones (1994)"
Results 61 - 80
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
In both Jones and Riley, the Supreme Court re-evaluated long held assumptions in light of new technological developments. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Theo was a talented lawyer, kind friend and wonderful colleague to many (including to at least two of the Kat team) over the course of his career.After studying biochemistry at the University of York, Theo started his career at Allen & Overy, qualifying in 1994, where GuestKat Stephen Jones worked with the then young associate on a mixture of IP litigation cases. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Blasdel, 881 S.W.2d 295, 297 (Tex. 1994). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Attention has fallen on North Carolina for a 1979 court decision on withdrawal of consent during sexual intercourse. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
One was from Mother Jones magazine. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Res. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Murillo was ordered removed from the U.S. last month and now faces felony immigration charges for illegal re-entry. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Against Her Will: The Carrie Buck Story (TVM 1994). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Against Her Will: The Carrie Buck Story (TVM 1994). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm
Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128 (1961), Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128 (1961), Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:24 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas - 14th District 2017: Kahlid Yusuf Worrell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
" (Jones v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
See Order re: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 159), Case No. 2:15-cv-03462 (C.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
See Order re: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 159), Case No. 2:15-cv-03462 (C.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
See also In re Paoli Yard PCB Litigation, 35 F.3d 717, 761 n.31 (3d Cir. 1994) (same theory also not applicable to toxic tort cases) (applying Pennsylvania law).Increased risk-type theories have also been asserted, and rejected, in Pennslyvania federal district courts. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:11 am
An article entitled, “Chokehold, Brain Injuries, Beatings: When School Cops Go Bad,” appeared in Mother Jones. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
