Search for: "In re Kennard"
Results 61 - 76
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
And when you have Justice Joyce Kennard interrupting your sputtering every 30 seconds to restate the question she doesn't think you're managing to answer, you might wanna just call it a day. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:20 pm
re here.??? [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
Justice Joyce Kennard: ??? [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:48 am
But they’re doing a stodgy institution a huge favor. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:40 pm
Perhaps that's because they're well aware of the gun's existence. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 11:53 pm
Musharraf suspended the constitution on Saturday ahead of a Supreme Court ruling on whether his recent re-election as president was legal. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
By contrast, if they're totally reckless; well, that's another matter. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
But I think that Justice Kennard, who wrote the majority opinion, with whom Chief Justice George and Justices Werdegar and Moreno joined, has the much better of the argument. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
I think we're simply looking at whether a class waiver is okay. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
" (Editor's note: we're not at all sure we agree that it is the only compensation available.) [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard went on: "You're asking us to agree with your position because it's reflected in the pretty clear statutory scheme, the use of the word 'pay' in (b). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:53 am
Regardless of which side you're on. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
Just report to the cops that they're driving drunk or have a gun and watch the guns-drawn fun.The fact that everyone agrees on the result here doesn't mean there's substantial agreement, and Justice Kennard writes a separate concurrence, as does Justice Werdegar (joined by Justice Moreno), to explain their disagreement with many of the arguments adopted by the majority. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Kennard interrupted to point out that we're not just dealing with potential witnesses, but rather with percipient witnesses. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:51 pm
Today, the Supreme Court granted review in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
Justice Werdegar writes the dissent, joined by Justices Kennard and Moreno.It's not every day that you have the swing vote in the California Supreme Court sitting by designation. [read post]
