Search for: "In re MF"
Results 61 - 80
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
In re L.F., supra. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 3:29 pm
What did these leaders - MF and UFS - have to say on the subject? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:08 am
Case No. 2:09-cv-01099-DMC-MF (D.N.J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:01 am
It’s that time of year again, and we’re not talking about tips for the countless number of people who seem to have their hands out at this time of year. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
”, which I have always (until Re H) considered represent an adequate summary of “conduct of litigation” (i and ii) and rights of audience (iii). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:04 am
In re Mutual Funds Inv. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:17 pm
You’re the best, Perplexed Taxgirl says: That certainly is perplexing! [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
It’s rare that MFS produces a significantly better tax result, especially with dependent children. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:20 am
Therefore, she is entitled to claim the credit on the full value of the house – up to the MFS limit. 5) The MFS limit is $4,000. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
For example, a Wall Street brokerage, MF Global, went bankrupt last Fall. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 pm
Back to Work and MF have indicated they both intend to rally again next Tuesday, Feb. 17th at the AMPTP (studio alliance), when talks are widely expected to start. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:58 am
If all of that is true, you’re good to go. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:45 am
If you’re wondering whether you can claim wardrobe expenses or whether to deduct a capital loss, this is one series you won’t want to miss. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:33 am
What about the B-word or the MF-word? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:50 am
Supreme Court Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2011] UKSC 5 (1 February 2011) ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Steed v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 75 (01 February 2011) Barclay & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 32 (01 February 2011) Hereworth v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 74 (01 February 2011) Welsh v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 73 (01 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) D’ Silva v Manchester… [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
A re-fi used for those purposes would also qualify. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:44 am
Additionally, to qualify, you can’t be claimed as a dependent by another person or file as Married Filing Separately (MFS) unless you fall under a specific exception. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Don Galante, Senior V.P. at MF Global Ltd. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 2:18 pm
" If you’re still legally married, you must file as such (so it sounds like, from your question, that you would file as MFS - married filing separately). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 4:10 am
Although they'd probably send alternates, this dilution may increase the ability of MF to control the agenda. [read post]
