Search for: "In re Millette"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 6:27 pm
Endo Pharmaceuticals and Impax Laboratories reached an agreement whereby Endo agreed not to re-launch a certain extended release opioid drug, Endo clarified that Impax held a license for all of its patents related to that drug, and Impax paid Endo a share of the profits from its generic version of the same drug. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:27 am
Judges Millett and Kavanaugh offer two admonitions. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
” Millett inquired. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
Henderson abuse of process, as now understood, although separate and distinct from [res judicata], has much in common with [it]. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
Nelson out: “You’re not asserting that the action can be brought anytime within six years after the government has already taken the land. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:48 am
Judge Patricia Millett (D.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
Millett thus emphasized Mr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:47 pm
Bush) and Judge Millett by a Democrat (Barack Obama). [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” So, the Justice wondered, “How do we know they’re not monsters? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
We're supposed to support the furthering of the careers of women and see that as feminism. [read post]
1 May 2007, 2:26 pm
It is highly unlikely that Deanne Maynard, Patricia Millett, or Lisa Blatt from the SG's Office is the object of the Craigslist poster's affection. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am
In Re Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri, No. 21-1208, involves a petitioner who has been charged with offenses to be tried by military commission. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
They could do so by re-nominating and re-confirming the military judges to be CMCR judges. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Of note, the dissent includes a footnote (at pg. 16) suggesting that the district court could impose a more severe punishment during re-sentencing. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Of note, the dissent includes a footnote (at pg. 16) suggesting that the district court could impose a more severe punishment during re-sentencing. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am
See In re Restoring Internet Freedom, 33 FCC Rcd. 311 (2018) ("2018 Order"). [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm
I’ll also ignore In re Sealed Case because I have no idea what it says. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
" Chief Justice Roberts glumly remarked, "I suppose if we're going to apply the Brecht standard ourselves, we would have to do the same thing. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
"I'll be very surprised if they don't freshly re-examine some of the positions the previous administration has taken," said Mr. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
In re Ricardo Group plc [1989] BCLC 566, Millett J said ‘the only legitimate purpose of a restriction order is to coerce a recalcitrant respondent into providing the requisite information’. [read post]
