Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 61 - 80
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
In re G.J.D., 2010-Ohio-2677 (11th Dist.) [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
R.C. 3103.03 was not originally gender-neutral. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
"got very mad," so she confronted appellee, put her finger in his face, and threatened that "we're going to get you. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:29 am
The court found that the settlement approval process set forth in R.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In re G.J.D., 2010-Ohio-2677 (11th Dist.) [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:27 am
While the case law on the subject deals primarily with claimants’ requests for reimbursement of deposition costs, the statute, and judges in numerous orders throughout the state, have interpreted the statute as entitling employers to re-imbursement as well. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Final Appealable Order This case involves the category of orders under R.C. 2505.02(B) that “affect a substantial right made in a special proceeding. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
”) In re Nat’l Century Fin. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
”) In re Nat’l Century Fin. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:31 am
R.C. 2949.14 (provides for collection of court costs from non-indigent felons.) [read post]
6 May 2018, 7:45 pm
., R.C. [read post]
6 May 2018, 7:45 pm
., R.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am
Do you have to determine first that you’re a non-smoker, and then you go through the prima facie process, or is it at some point along the way? [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am
In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 148 A.D.3d 233 (2017) (Cumulative exposure theory is irreconcilable with the requirements to present some quantitative information to assess the amount, frequency, and duration of exposure to determine whether exposure was sufficient to constitute a contributing factor of the disease.) [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 pm
The Ashcraft holding was subsequent codified in R.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
”) In re Nowak, 2004-Ohio-6777 (“[t]he proposition that the one-subject rule is both directory and potentially capable of being applied by the court to invalidate a law is essentially an oxymoron. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:30 pm
In re D.H., Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-17 (Juvenile court orders transferring jurisdiction to adult court are not final orders under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4).) [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Further, in R.C. 2929.03(F), the trial judge must articulate his or her factual findings by issuing a written opinion outlining the independent re-weighing of the relevant factors. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
In re B.M., 2009-Ohio-4846(10th Dist.) [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 11:33 am
Not an affidavit from the physician, so we’re doing this,” and the trial went forward. [read post]
