Search for: "In re R.J." Results 61 - 80 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
Airline Pilots Association Sets a Misguided Ripeness Standard for Duty of Fair Representation Claims R.J. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Non-final orders -- Order declaring that certain provisions of a settlement agreement are binding and enforceable, and directing parties to reconvene settlement negotiations, is a non-appealable, non-final order -- Argument that court has jurisdiction under rule which provides for the appeal of non-final orders concerning injunctions is rejected -- Order is not designed to protect property or other rights from injury by prohibiting or commanding certain acts, and is more akin to a case… [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by William A. Ruskin
  In one case,  In re New York County Data Entry Worker Product Liability Litigation, No. 14003/92, 1994 WL 87529 (N.Y. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
.' Not long into the opening statement, the State also said, still in the first-person and from R.J.'s perspective, 'Now, my State's Attorneys, Miss Roseanne McDonnell and Theo Jamison then, they're going to present this evidence to you today.'" The court found:  "Although the use of a first-person delivery may not be error under other circumstances, in this case it improperly bolstered the credibility of the State's… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 pm by Simon Lester
“ISDS has come under some legitimate criticism, when they’re poorly written, because they’ve been used in particular by some tobacco countries in some countries to challenge anti-tobacco regulation. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
.' Not long into the opening statement, the State also said, still in the first-person and from R.J.'s perspective, 'Now, my State's Attorneys, Miss Roseanne McDonnell and Theo Jamison then, they're going to present this evidence to you today.'" The court found:  "Although the use of a first-person delivery may not be error under other circumstances, in this case it improperly bolstered the credibility of the State's… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Cal Warriner
The case was re-tried and the jury again found Philip Morris’ conduct to have been reprehensible and awarded 13.8 million dollars. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:24 am
People somehow think they're not influenced by this and that advertisers are wasting billions of dollars.Throughout, people have said that those who want to regulate commercial speech are foisting ideologies on others. [read post]