Search for: "In re Roby"
Results 61 - 73
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2009, 4:14 pm
--you're reading it as comedy. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
We're heading into Thanksgiving Week. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:10 pm
We're aware of quite a few awards fall into that category. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Not our job -- or role -- to do otherwise.Justice Robie writes a separate opinion. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:33 am
Icannot ask you to go into the room, nor can you go into the room believing that you're doing so for myself. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:50 am
Especially in a case, as here, in which it's pretty clear that what we're dealing with is a nonfinal order. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
But it's nice -- very nice -- at least once in a while.Thanks, Justice Robie. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Is that what you're saying? [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
There again, the premise of your question is they're the very same documents. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
The fact that Scruggs had just contributed $33,000 to his re-election campaign, he said, had absolutely nothing to do with his decision -- didn't even serve as an attention-getter.Another curious aspect of Hood's testimony is he portrayed himself far differently than he has throughout his career, especially when running for re-election last year. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 9:21 pm
"If you're asking me, 'Did somebody come to me and threaten me? [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 4:40 am
So, the jury awarded $15 million in punitive damages against McKesson, on top of a multi-million dollar damages verdict.The California Court of Appeal Roby v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
Robie held that Section 1054.9 does not require defendants to prove the documents they're seeking actually exist. [read post]
