Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 236"
Results 61 - 80
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
In reviewing the legal principles which apply in disposal cases, it stated: “[51]. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
” In re D-J- expressly justified detention of asylum seekers on the basis of the deterrent effects on future arrivals. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Addressing only the precise question before us, and based on our analysis of the relevant statutes and precedents, we conclude that New York state and local law enforcement officers are not authorized by New York law to effectuate arrests for civil law immigration violations.The Relevant FactsThe facts are undisputed. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Five years after the transposition of the Directive into national law (i.e.: 21 December 2012) Member States must re-examine the justification for those exemptions, taking into account the most recent actuarial and statistical data and a report to be submitted by the Commission three years after the date of transposition of the Directive. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
However, in looking at the proof submitted by the husband, the Court of Appeals stated that it “need not definitively resolve the question of whether a cure is possible because, similar to what occurred in Matisoff, the proof submitted here was insufficient” (id. at 197). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
However, in looking at the proof submitted by the husband, the Court of Appeals stated that it “need not definitively resolve the question of whether a cure is possible because, similar to what occurred in Matisoff, the proof submitted here was insufficient” (id. at 197). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
Doe Run Res. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
Purdue Pharma Co., 236 F. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
"Bulldog", was admitted to White House press conferences as a journalist without proper vetting and allowed to ask such sympathetic questions that The Daily Show referred to him as "Chip Rightwingenstein of the Bush Agenda Gazette. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
” In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, 837 F. 3d 175, 189 (2016). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
In re PRP of Elmore, 162 Wn.2d 236, 256-59 (2007). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Mineral Products Co., 587 Pa. 236, 253-54, 898 A.2d 590, 601 (2006) ("DGS"), and finally expressly took up the issue in Bugosh v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
Friday on the state charges. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
Friday on the state charges. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Law School as Social Innovation Lorne Sossin, Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University(2017) 48 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 225-236 [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 am
(In re Strada Design Associates, Inc.), 326 B.R. 229, 236 (Bankr. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Just Answer the Questions Already… 1) Can the state proceed on the original indictment? [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The trial judge stated: “I read your submissions carefully, and it’s obvious to me that you’re not a sophisticated person as far as your knowledge of the law. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
Defense counsels’ expounded justification for instructing their clients not to answer questions about their state of knowledge is a misguided interpretation of the privilege, at best. [read post]
