Search for: "In re T. T." Results 61 - 80 of 219,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2021, 6:48 am by Steve Parker
  The post In Defense of Re- Re-locating to Georgia appeared first on RIA Compliance Blog. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We’re not going to comment on that, because we don’t want to say anything that could possibly get quoted back at us in a one of our own cases not involving drugs or devices. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore the Board is of the opinion that in the present case the OD, based on decision T 804/05, in the end has applied the principles of decision T 381/87 and thus applied the balance of probabilities. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
According to D68, these proceedings have been pending until 25 October 2013, ie until after the oral proceedings before the present board and until after the decision announced therein.An action taken against the property of an opponent, here une procédure de Liquidation Judiciare [re-sic] Normale under French law against DF3 SAS, does not take away the opponent’s party status (T 696/02 [7.2]) and does not entail an interruption of the proceedings, R 142 covering… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:26 pm
Plus since we're in the same state, I might run into her while wearing it and she can yell at me for not being her. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:44 am by Unreported Opinions
Read the opinion The post IN RE: T.C. first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Is this a case of res judicata or isn’t it? [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Romano Beitsma
Discussing the case law, including T 0641/00 (Comvik) and T 1227/05 (Infineon), the Board distinguishes two different approaches. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:29 pm by Angel Reyes III
I was traveling, and I was t-boned by an SUV that flipped over, and both our cars were badly wrecked, but mine was totaled. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:22 pm by Glenn Reynolds
WHAT OBAMA DIDN’T TELL CONGRESS: The health-care bill doesn’t cover re-election efforts. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Dies würde den Einsprechenden benachteiligen und wäre auch nicht verfahrensökonomisch. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, G 5/83 ([…] and A 54(5) EPC 2000, which according to the EBA in G 2/08 [5.9 ff.] is considered to fill the lacuna in the EPC 1973 which had been filled in a praetorian way by the EBA with G 5/83 and the case law based on that decision) has consistently been interpreted by the boards as not providing for the patentability of uses in any of the methods recited in A 52(4) EPC 1973 (or A 53(c) EPC 2000) involving means that are a “device” (see for example T 1314/05… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Decision T 702/89 has declined to extend these principles to the time limit for filing an opposition, for the following reasons:“[3] Concerning the request for re-establishment of rights [3.1] The requirements relating to admissibility of a request under A 122 filed by the opponent were set out in part in above-mentioned decision G 1/86 of the EBA. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The opponent also argued that the main request should not be admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA and in line with decisions T 144/09 and T 936/09. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:01 am by Jon Brodkin
The revival of T-Mobile US has given cellular customers more viable options, but that doesn't mean the company is going to become a sustainable business. [read post]