Search for: "In re Wing Y." Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2016, 8:01 am
Cushman saw tweets that made specific references to parts of the school, C-wing and D-wing, and specific people. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:56 am by Bill Marler
  Targeting Commonly Purchased Items: In February 2016, FSIS finalized the first-ever pathogen reduction standards for poultry parts, like breasts and wings. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:15 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
When it comes to our kids, we’ve all been in those moments where we just wing it. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 8:41 pm by David Schraub
The problem is not that no Mizrahi Jews believe in either of these extreme narratives, much less that all Mizrahi Jews agree on how to interpret their collective history (the statement "not all Xs believe Y" will be true of any group X of non-trivial size regarding any issue Y of non-trivial contestability, where X is not defined by belief in Y). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
& Pol’y 337 (2005).[1] FYI - this is a case involving the MPIA, whereas chicken and turkey fall under the PPIA. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:53 am by Unknown
 Logical Fallacy"Post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy referring to questionable causation, that is, "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Cushman saw tweets that made specific references to parts of the school, C-wing and D-wing, and specific people. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
However, since only specific expressions are protected, extensive parts of the culture are not, as it is sometimes claimed walled off from creative re-use. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
” Not easy stuff to, y’know, picture. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Clark
Person X was dating person Y. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:53 am by Jordan Bublick
 In short, what Spock is saying is that "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy referring to questionable causation, that is, "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:53 am by Jordan Bublick
 In short, what Spock is saying is that "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy referring to questionable causation, that is, "since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
 It’s not that we’re not sports-crazed, obviously; many, many people in this country, of course, live or die with their teams – the Steelers or the Saints, the Red Sox or the Red Wings, the Orioles or the Cardinals . . . [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Or they’re infringing, via torrent; or they’re physically copying the book at the copy machine—dean sent a message at her school last year advising against this practice. [read post]