Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 61 - 80
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am
Williamson dealt with R.C. 2319.27, not R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
Justice Kennedy’s Dissent Justice Kennedy agrees with the lead opinion that R.C. 3107.04(A) is unambiguous. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:52 am
The dealer essentially reimburses HCA for the difference between the market-rate interest and the below-market interest collected from customers. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Terry Shaffer’s Second Proposition of Law Not Accepted for Review An appellate court, reviewing a factual determination under a highly deferential standard, cannot compel a fact-finder to accept as clear and convincing evidence the testimony of an interested witness at an R.C. 2107.24 hearing. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:35 am
The medical privilege should be upheld over the best-interest-of-the-child analysis. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
The fact that Bozso is a refugee also shows that he had a significant interest in avoiding any deportation proceedings: a refugee is a person who has no nationality and is unable or unwilling to return to [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
A child does not have any legally protected interest which is invaded by proper and reasonable parental discipline. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
Thus, the Third District held that Rasawehr’s conduct was done for the illegitimate purposes proscribed by R.C. 2903.211 and therefore was not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
The Future of Wrongful Dismissal Claims: Where Does Employer Self Interest Lie? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
R.C. 3109.04(F)(1)(e) (A court shall consider the mental and physical health of all persons involved in the situation when determining the best interest of the child for the purposes of allocating parental rights and responsibilities in a child custody dispute.) [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
The issue in the case was whether a trial court’s denial of an appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw due to a conflict of interest is a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and, if so, whether the motion was properly denied in this case. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
The court cannot use R.C. 2093.211 to prohibit Rasawehr’s publications before they have even occurred. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
And in Ohio Supreme Court action, a one-sentence, 307-word dissent: "I join Justice Lanzinger's well-reasoned dissent, but write separately to highlight the General Assembly's failure in legislative drafting exemplified by former R.C. 2929.14(D)(3), which the majority opinion relegates to a footnote to fully accommodate its 24 lines of unrelenting abstruseness consisting, remarkably, of the sum total of 307 words and a mere one period, a punctuation mark set out as a lone… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
At issue in this case is whether a trial court’s denial of an appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw due to a conflict of interest is a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and, if so, whether the motion was properly denied in this case. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 5302.04 (“In a conveyance of real estate or any interest therein, all rights, easements, privileges, and appurtenances belonging to the granted estate shall be included in the conveyance, unless the contrary is stated in the deed, and it is unnecessary to enumerate or mention them either generally or specifically. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am
The Court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mother’s name. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
At issue in this case is whether a trial court’s denial of an appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw due to a conflict of interest is a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and, if so, whether the motion was properly denied in this case. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
Key Statutes and Precedent R.C. 5302.04 (“In a conveyance of real estate or any interest therein, all rights, easements, privileges, and appurtenances belonging to the granted estate shall be included in the conveyance, unless the contrary is stated in the deed, and it is unnecessary to enumerate or mention them either generally or specifically. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
The adult portion of the blended sentence can only be imposed for further misconduct under R.C. 2152.14(A) or (B). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
The bank has a property interest in any check it pays out. [read post]
