Search for: "In the Interest of A.C." Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 10:25 pm
Cartwright, [1955] A.C. 431, have said that in trying to find out what someone intended, the court may only consider what he or she says or does before the transfer or at about the same time as the transfer, unless what he or she says or does is against his or her own interest. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Lowe, [1975] A.C. 135 (H.L.), at p. 149. 145     Malice is commonly understood, in the popular sense, as spite or ill-will. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C., 121 USPQ2d 1477 (TTAB 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:52 am by emagraken
(f)         disclosure by the defendant will not cause the defendant irreparable harm; and (g)        the interests of justice favour granting the relief. [7] In the affidavit filed in support of this action counsel for Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm by Christopher Weimer (US)
Luxco’s interest in the case arises from its own use of the term tequila on three of its liquor brands (Juarez, Exotico, and El Mayor). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:07 am by Dianne Saxe
Lapointe, [1909] 42 S.C.R. 521 (S.C.C.), rev’d, [1911] A.C. 520 (Quebec P.C [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:32 pm
Instead, an owner of a certification mark is required to test a list of criteria against the products of other interested manufacturers to determine whether their products meet the ‘certification' criteria, and hence, able to form an agreement to use the registered certification mark on its products. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm by Christopher Weimer (US)
Luxco’s interest in the case arises from its own use of the term tequila on three of its liquor brands (Juarez, Exotico, and El Mayor). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:26 am by gmlevine
” The Court held that “[l]ike a share of corporate stock or a plot of land, a domain name is a well-defined interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
In an interesting judgment delivered earlier this month, Chandler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 (H.L.), at p. 776.) [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Citibank N.A., [1987] A.C. 730 (P.C.), which reviewed various relevant authorities as obiter dicta but confirmed the requirement for special or extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
From In the Matter of A.C., decided today by the Indiana Court of Appeals (Judge Terry Crone, joined by Judges Nancy Vaidik and Robert Altice): M.C. [read post]