Search for: "In the Interest of LaRue"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
Anyone interested in the insurance implications of LaRue should find it a useful and informative post. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
Note the particularly interesting post from Texas attorney Jamie Spencer, on the potential employment pitfalls of blogging. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 10:05 pm
The report contains some interesting views from the 90 mediation users (lawyers and parties) who participated in a number of focus groups.For instance, users thought these mediator interventions are helpful in half or more of their cases:ô€â [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:40 pm
In LaRue v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided LaRue v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:17 am
The competing opinions present some interesting issues. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:55 am
As anticipated, the LaRue decision contains interesting footnotes. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 5:10 am
Why has the Roberts Court become so interested in labor and employment law issues? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:58 am
Today was a particularly good day in the LexBlogosphere - a lot of great content coming out, with enough interesting material to keep legal-minded readers busy during their lunch breaks. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:09 am
Garrett's sexual activism exemplifies why our "adult" pornography laws are ignored by those whose special interests misdirect our justice system. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
One wonders, if some special interest will spike the government's motion to stay. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:43 pm
Move over LaRue, the Supreme Court today granted a second ERISA case this term - this one involving structural conflicts of interest in denial of benefit claim cases under Section 502(a)(1)(B). [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:24 pm
LaRue v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
Tom Gies: An interesting question. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:48 am
You know, people often get bogged down when talking about ERISA with the limitations of the statute and the protections it provides on the individual level; that is, to an extent, what the hullabaloo about the LaRue case is about, as it concerns the question of whether investment losses in a 401(k) plan are actionable if they only injure an individual, or instead only if they have a macro effect on the plan as a whole. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:40 pm
If you're really interested, links to the briefs of the parties can be found here. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
Interesting argument, and interesting lines of questions from the court, although I am skeptical as to how much guidance as to the court’s thinking one can draw from the Justice’s questions themselves. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 12:16 pm
In its opinion, the Fourth Circuit said that a lawsuit is okay when it seeks to enforce the rights of the whole plan, rather than just the interests of a single account. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
” As the Prof points out, the Court’s request to the Solicitor General’s office for input does not necessarily mean the Court will take the cases, but certainly raises the possibility that it will; at a minimum, it reflects the interest of at least some segment of the Court in how the law governing ERISA is evolving. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:39 am
It argued that LaRue has withdrawn all of the funds from his pension account and thus he is no longer a plan participant, leaving him with "no legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the case. [read post]
