Search for: "In the Matter of Dawkins"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Francis FitzGibbon QC considers Professor Dawkins’s Jury Delusion Having seen off God, Professor Dawkins turns his attention to another object of veneration, the jury, in the The New Statesman. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 4:23 pm
. - Richard Dawkins A God who kept tinkering with the universe was absurd; a God who interfered with human freedom and creativity was tyrant. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
The matter is part heard. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:56 am
Consider this thread on the subject full of appalling false-consciousness-pimping statism-apologias at Richard Dawkin’s site. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:43 am
Only the timeless seems to matter to most neuroscientists. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
The line between criticism in religious matters and blasphemy is a very thin one, as European history has shown. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 1:49 am
Must the law also call for assistance to the more powerful actors of that universe: the invisible cold dark matter and the dark energy of the primordial underlying forces? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS UKHRB posts Outlawing Dawkins hoax July 21, 2012 Rosalind English Outlawing god? [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:20 am
: "Qld State of Origin Rugby League team" pjblack.me/JukGIx from @MotherJones: "The War Between Data and Storytelling" pjblack.me/JL63kJ from the @nytimes: "CBS Sues ABC Over Show It Says Copies ‘Big Brother’" pjblack.me/Jw62zH people have more of an emotional brain response to words in larger fonts: "(Font) Size Matters, Says Study" pjblack.me/Jw59qZ "The reinvention of the bookseller: Coffee shops were game… [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
DPP’s power to block war crimes arrests is in the public interest Critics who allege that arrest decisions would be liable to political interference are deliberately misunderstanding the case While it may appeal to Richard Dawkins and others to arrest Popes when they visit here… or Israeli government officials.. or, indeed anyone who can come within the definition of a war criminal….some would say, the odd president of the United States, former British prime ministers… [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Read more: Libel on the internet: Christian author takes on Dawkins and Amazon The rising cost of free speech: Reynolds, contempt and Twitter Times can use leaked Police documents in libel defence Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Defamation / Libel, In the news Tagged: Defamation Bill, free expression, libel reform, Queen's Speech [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
In these cases, what was contemplated was a situation where a person may on isolated occasions be required to spend a very short amount of time professing a feigned opinion on a matter of politics. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
Sapp & Sturgill PLLC and Duncan Strickland continue to file lawsuits in the Western and Northern Districts for plaintiffs who, amazingly enough, always live within 30 miles of the business they sue, no matter where it is. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm
However, this is not an end to the matter; the extent of publication is simply a preliminary step. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
While the court acknowledged that those were matters for argument, they were not decisive in Google’s favour where the court was concerned only with whether there was an arguable case of publication.One issue that is left uncertain when applying Byrne v Deane is whether it is relevant to consider if the defendant platform has knowledge of the words complained of and their illegality or potential illegality. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am
(By the way, there’s also the matter of service of process. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
A public interest defence already exists for libel (the Reynolds “responsible reporting” defence), and, Bailin and Craven argue, should exist also for investigative journalism, rather than leaving genuine investigative journalists at the mercy of prosecutorial discretion, no matter how benevolent and structured the guidelines are. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:45 pm
There is a fact of the matter, but we do not have a test for determining it. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Who is a journalist and why it matters. [read post]
