Search for: "In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: T. L. S." Results 61 - 80 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am by Maxwell Kennerly
See footnote 2 for more about why nolo contendre doesn’t preclude a later civil rights lawsuit. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The court decided 104 civil cases (disregarding attorney discipline, juvenile and commitment matters). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:26 pm by Helene L Taylor
In essence, Ex-Husband committed three Federal felonies and perjury punishable by state law, all to save himself $2,000. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm by Quinta Jurecic
(Full disclosure: Protect Democracy is also representing Lawfare staff members Benjamin Wittes, Susan Hennessey, and Scott Anderson in several matters, including matters under the Freedom of Information Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Data Quality Act.) [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The religiously objecting discriminator may be complicit in our supposed sin, or pursue other market activities, but our law’s commitments to civil equality should not be undermined with such exemptions.David B. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
DHS then sought court orders authorizing an in-home visit; part of the basis was "the family's prior involvement with DHS, which consisted of a dependency matter that began in 2013 when DHS received a GPS report indicating that the family home 'was in deplorable condition; that there were holes in the walls; that the home was infested with fleas; that the home lacked numerous interior walls; that the interior structure of the home was exposed; that the home lacked… [read post]
20 May 2021, 6:09 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  Originally filed as separate complaints, the Critter Control matter was dismissed for plaintiff’s lack of standing, as the Court held “[t]he statute was ‘plain and unambiguous’ . . . providing that ‘only select organizations, not individuals, may pursue a civil remedy under the statute. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
This is a court of law, and “‘[t]he law knows no heresy, and is committed to the support of no dogma, the establishment of no sect.'” United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am by Law Lady
  Stay healthy and safe everyone.Attorney's fees -- Civil rights -- Prevailing party -- Award of prevailing party attorney's fees and expenses to plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. section 1988 must be vacated and remanded for additional proceedings where jury awarded only nominal damages for defendant's violation of plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal seizure and district court in determining reasonableness of a fee… [read post]
And she never wavered in her commitment to the belief that women should be in all the places where decisions are made (as the popular Ruth Bader Ginsburg saying goes) and have the same opportunities to capitalize on their natural talents and abilities as men have.Over the course of several books, including Justice and Gender (1991) and Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality (1999), Professor Rhode engaged in the project of chronicling the ways in which gender affected every single… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
In that context, the UN Human Rights Resolution  "On promoting mutually beneficial cooperation in the field of human rights" (A/HRC/37/L.36; 19 March 2018), sponsored by and reflecting an important new perspective of the People's Republic of China is worth considering in some detail. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:43 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  Under the terms of the bill, cyber thereat information may only be disclosed when a crime “has been, is being, or is about to be committed” and then only in conformance with a set of privacy and civil liberties protection procedures that the Secretary of DHS is charged with developing. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 2:47 pm by Michael C. Dorf
I do think they misapplied it.The university presidents invoked distinctions that definitely matter to the question whether the government can proscribe speech or even subject speakers to civil liability. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
The Committee approved it by a recorded vote of 125 in favour to 48 against, with 9 abstentions (Armenia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Iceland, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Türkiye, United Arab Emirates). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
But the meaning of the constitutional text, as a matter of textual argument, isn’t up to me. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
It won’t surprise long-time readers to learn that I approve of Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]