Search for: "In the Matter of the General Determination of Rights to the Use of Water" Results 61 - 80 of 1,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” Plaintiffs’ new Water Code claim – asserting that a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was required for the project changes and not prepared – also failed as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
According to A 87(1), a requirement for enjoying a right [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:36 am by James W. Davis
The right to asylum is a specific example of a more general development whereby rights have become integral to our conceptions of justice. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Breyer concurrence: result will be watering down of strict scrutiny, which is not so good. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
So many of the high water marks of the First Amendment were etched during the civil rights era. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am by IncNow
Even without this “mission lock”, directors of general corporations are within their rights to consider the impact of their decisions beyond the shareholders. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
It is a matter of common knowledge today that PFAS chemicals are toxic. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:08 pm
“A court applying the location test must determine whether the tort occurred on navigable water or whether injury suffered on land was caused by a vessel on navigable water. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
To achieve such intersectional approaches, the social determinants of health provide a useful framework. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am by Richard Hunt
Sometimes the lack of technical standards increases the time and money spent in litigation, as in the first entry below, but more often technical matters of procedure and expert testimony determine the outcome of a case. [read post]