Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. A. M"
Results 61 - 80
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Section 508 just refers back to Section 501…so I’m not even sure why Section 506 refers to Section 508. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) I’m delighted to report that the new UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic has filed its first brief, on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
For 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, like the Sierra Club, AARP, and the NRA, 501(c)(5) unions, and 501(c)(6) trade and professional associations and chambers of commerce, there is no limit to lobbying so long as it furthers their exempt purpose and the organizations can engage in political campaign intervention so long as that is not their primary activity. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
C. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am
I am quite satisfied that the Judge failed to drill down into the realities of this complicated situation and failed, notwithstanding her direction to herself, to ensure that M's welfare needs were paramount. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Translational similarity matters: same meaning in different language could bar registration. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 344-45 (1975) (quoting C. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Merges & Nelson on patent scope, Burk & Lemley on policy levers—if you read these side by side, you see M&N say patents are unsuited to software b/c corporate capital isn’t involved and it’s individual; B&L 20 years later say that patents are perfectly suited—b/c institutions have changed, everything else has changed in terms of economic analysis, policy analysis. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Both Mr & Mrs Hardy receive Disability Allowance mobility (DLA(m)) and care (DLA(c)) components. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 am
I'm not sure ISDS supporters would even disagree with that. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:56 am
Doctors referred the case to Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families (DCF), which took the matter to the Connecticut Superior Court. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
by Michael C. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 7:03 pm
Nationally known for her work on health care reform and related matters, Ms. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:15 am
In a simple optimal income tax model, it doesn't matter, but in the real world it might. [read post]
