Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: E. E., Child" Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2008, 9:14 am
Carlson Marketing Group);Said that where a child had been struck with a small paddle about 36 times there was no showing of physical or mental injury amounting to "physical abuse" under the child protection statutes (In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N.F. and S.F., Parents);Reversed a termination of parental rights case because substance abuse alone does not make a parent palpably unfit and the county may not unilaterally decide that… [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court only took this approach because the Court had before it a companion custody matter, wherein the Court could exercise control in the best interest of the child. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
There is no set age under the Convention at which a child is deemed to  be sufficiently mature; rather, the Third Circuit guides that the district court hearing the matter must make this fact-intensive determination on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
The court found a “substantial change in circumstances impacting the welfare of the minor child that justifies an indefinite suspension of the child custody provisions in the permanent order” had occurred since entry of the Consent Judgment. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
She challenges ACS's reliance on the NYPD and medical reports, arguing that they were prepared in conjunction with her criminal investigation and not child protective matters. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:58 am by K.O. Herston
[W]e conclude that the trial court erred in ruling that DCS did not have to make reasonable efforts to assist Father regarding reunification because DCS eventually proved, at the termination hearing, the allegation that Father abandoned [Child] by engaging in conduct exhibiting wanton disregard for her welfare prior to his incarceration. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As defined by Family Court Act section 1012 (e) (i) and (ii). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It would not be a stretch to say that people, in most circumstances, have the right to be quiet about such matters—perhaps even to lie about them. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am by PaulKostro
That requirement stems from the deep-rooted but sometimes conflicting principles that “`parents have a constitutionally-protected, fundamental liberty interest in raising their biological children, even if those children have been placed in foster care[,]‘” and that “`the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children . . . is limited to situations in which the state has demonstrated that the child’s parent or custodian… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Indian child welfare: Indian nations develop child welfare codes and court structures, litigate ICW matters in tribal and state courts, and advocate for Indian children in other ways. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am by Stephen Page
  What threats have been made, if any, to take the child away? [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by John Palley
All hospitals, local child support agencies, welfare offices, and family courts shall facilitate genetic tests for purposes of enforcement of this chapter. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Proximity may be evidence sufficient to defeat summary judgment if accompanied by something more, such as, a hotel receipt for two, plane tickets for two to a particular destination deviating from the norm, potentially incriminating or suspicious e-mails or other writings, frequent get-togethers in non-professional settings, flirtatious behavior, or a suspicious conversation overheard by a witness. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To prevent such an outcome, the Court may invoke its temporary emergency jurisdiction powers in such a matter "if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child, a sibling or parent of the child. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To prevent such an outcome, the Court may invoke its temporary emergency jurisdiction powers in such a matter "if the child is present in this state and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child, a sibling or parent of the child." [read post]