Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. S. and D. A. S., Parents" Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Eugene Volokh
" We clarified that the "state's compelling interest to protect a child in any given case, however, is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent's speech is causing or will cause harm to a child's welfare. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking… [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm by Giles Peaker
H & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Ealing London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 841 (Admin) Ealing’s allocation policy has already had lawfulness problems, compounded by Ealing’s unlawful refusal to do anything about that unlawfulness. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm by Giles Peaker
What matters is whether as a matter of fact the required security is available. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 10:07 pm
Police and child welfare files contain no criminal histories, no hint that there were other suspicions or evidence of child abuse or neglect. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am by Russell Knight
“In allocating parenting time, the court shall not consider conduct of a parent that does not affect that parents relationship to the child. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Cicely Wilson
When an Indian parent abandons an Indian child before birth and that child has never been in that parents custody, the “breakup of the Indian family” has long since occurred, and section 1912(d) is inapplicable. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm by Russell Knight
R. 201 “The work-product doctrine in Illinois, which protects against disclosure of “the theories, mental impressions, or litigation plans of [a] party’s attorney” is believed necessary to prevent complete invasion of counsel’s files. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
The master characterized the atmosphere in Judge Ciavarella’s court as casting such a “pall” over the functioning of that court, its integrity was subverted, and recommended that each and every adjudication of a child in that court be vacated.[12] The recommendation included every child, whether having the benefit of counsel or not, and every child, whether or not sent to PA Child Care, or anywhere for that matter. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:42 am by But I Do Have a Law Degree
I knew in a matter of days that I’d need to go part-time/telecommute or I’d have to leave and find other work. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Pete Stark, D-Calif., re-introduced the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” H.R. 4806 (previous bill, H.R. 3827). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm by familoo
, although the court would have been entitled to make some order if it thought that was the appropriate course of action bearing in mind the need to promote the welfare of the child, and taking into consideration the Article 6, 8 and 10 rights of ALL the parties (including the child). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
There is a difference between physical custody which designates where the child will actually live and legal custody which gives the custodial parent(s) the right to make decisions for the child's welfare. [read post]