Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. T. and T. B., Parents"
Results 61 - 80
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:32 pm
My ex works in a hospital, shouldn’t our children stay with me? [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:31 am
”Virginia Code § 20-124.2(B). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
Gulian and her parents. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
Gulian and her parents. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Berry was not represented in the family law matter creating additional challenges. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:56 pm
”; it is “[i]mportant to deconstruct stereotypes about VAW and culture”, among many others (LCO Report, Appendix B, pp. 46ff). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am
But I think that when judges get things wrong they are entitled to the same sort of consideration we do (or should) give parents whose parenting has gone awry - to look at why things have fallen apart, and to think about whether they can be put back together. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Our trial courts are vested with broad discretion in child custody matters. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
The Juvenile Order found “that return of [the minor child] to the joint custody of her parents would be in the best interest of the child. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
They are the natural parents of two children, one deceased minor son and one minor daughter with special needs (“T.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Defendant requests that the Settlement Agreement should remain sealed until the final resolution of this matter and then returned to counsel…. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:01 am
The second was the enactment of welfare reform in 1996. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:11 am
And what of those who simply won't? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:13 am
Any barrister who isn’t a QC is a ‘junior barrister’ no matter how senior they are. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
(Parent living in foreign country, subject to no support order under divorce decree, did not fail to support his children by expending money on phone calls, cards, and gifts.) [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
We are the children of an invading culture. [read post]
