Search for: "In the matter of Anonymous, a minor Affirmed."
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm
The defendant in this case was a minor. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Next Steps No matter how the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court then considers the proposals and annually promulgates new rules, which can be rejected or modified by an affirmative act of Congress. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:14 am
(2) Does it impose an affirmative disability or restraint? [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:46 am
Though a greater proportion of minor victims are male, the majority remain girls. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:01 pm
As should be clear, this conclusion is a matter of characterization rather than simple factual assessment. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
California Rule of Court 8.401(a) imposes this and other procedures for preserving the minor’s anonymity. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
On the drive, she found what she described as ‘”hundreds” of images of minors engaged in sexual acts or exposing themselves in a sexual manner. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Eventually - certainly within some of our lifetimes - we'll be able to carry our entire individual genetic code around with us on a chip, should we so choose….The complaint in Mills is a bare genetic susceptibility claim, frankly based on an allegation of “variant” genetic characteristics shared by only a minority of the population. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Doesit even matter ...? [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
She claimed the positive test may have been the result of “contact exposure” at her Narcotics Anonymous meeting. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
Archdiocese of Portland, 249 F.R.D. 358, 361 (D.Or.2008) (plaintiff alleging that he was sexually abused as minor allowed to proceed anonymously); Doe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Several months later, still not knowing the true identity of the blog’s operators, she lost a summary judgment motion filed anonymously by “Doe 1. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
County Court affirmed, concluding the local law was constitutional to the extent it outlawed such activities directed at minors, and held that the application of the provision to [his] Facebook posts did not contravene his 1st Amendment rights. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
County Court affirmed, concluding the local law was constitutional to the extent it outlawed such activities directed at minors, and held that the application of the provision to [his] Facebook posts did not contravene his 1st Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
In case it assists the Court, it is my opinion that both these questions should be answered in the affirmative for the reasons advanced by counsel for CadburyThe IPKat would like to thank the various and several good souls -- both those who sought the protecting shade of anonymity and those who rather enjoy a bit of publicity but aren't going to get it this time around -- for tipping him off about this decision's publication and subsequent appearance on BAILII. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Interestingly enough, some of these scholars suggest that blind grading was deployed not so much to prevent discrimination against (otherwise identifiable) minority-group students, but rather to prevent faculty members who support affirmative action from affording a grading preference in favor of minority students. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:00 pm
Your sister has a baby conceived with sperm from an anonymous donor. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:20 am
Moreover, the Court concluded that such behavior merely “amounted to violations of internal company policies” and that “[v]ague and conclusory complaints, complaints about trivial or minor matters, or generalized workplace unhappiness are not the sort of things that the Legislature intended to be protected by CEPA. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:46 am
For example, the three rubber-banding claims it decided to affirm were also tentatively rejected at the stage of a first Office action. [read post]
