Search for: "Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 61 - 80
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
Plaintiffs support their securities claim by stating that because the allegedly related and misleading general corporate statements sustained an artificially inflated stock price, investors purchased common stock at a price that would not have been supported had the market known of the company’s true ability to generate future cash flows prior to the falter. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 pm
As way of background, to certify a class on behalf of all investors who purchased shares during a class period, plaintiffs usually invoke a presumption of reliance created by the Court in the Basic case. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
” The Basic Right Subsection 2(a) provides: Any person who uses a deceased personality’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods, or services, without prior consent from the person or persons specified in subdivision four of this section, shall be liable for any damages sustained by the person or persons injured as… [read post]
24 May 2021, 7:34 am
District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Boston certified classes of both direct purchasers, including drug wholesalers, and indirect purchasers, such as health plans and insurance companies. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:24 am
To certify a class on behalf of all investors who purchased shares during the class period, plaintiffs usually invoke a presumption of reliance created by the Court in the Basic case. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
The damages testimony in this trial is interesting for several reasons, including Plaintiff’s presentation of a regression analysis as the basis of its damages claim. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:37 pm
The key is the impact of indirect network effects. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
Put another way, Delaware’s High Court held that the fact that the right of first refusal is only triggered by transfers by the Minority Member is dispositive in favor of Borealis, regardless of whether the Hunt Sale could be said to effect an indirect transfer. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 6:38 am
Plaintiff started leasing the lot in 1992 and then purchased it in 2002 from Otto Schmidt, Jr. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
It was plaintiffs’ burden to establish the protected elements of their allegedly infringed work, and they didn’t show that what was copied was protectable. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 3:35 am
" The tricky part of the Pepper case--to the extent it reached the Supreme Court, where it was just about antitrust standing and not about the merits--was that the Illinois Brick doctrine doesn't let indirect purchasers seek antitrust damages. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm
On September 11, 2020, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Eastern District of New York against GOL, and certain of its officers on behalf of a class of investors who purchased the company’s securities during the period March 14, 2019 through July 22, 2020. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:36 pm
In the Pepper case, the Supreme Court basically sidestepped the Illinois Brick doctrine regarding indirect purchasers' antitrust standing by holding that consumers are direct purchasers from Apple, also paving the way for the Pistacchio complaint:"When [Pistacchio] and the Class purchased Apple Arcade, they did so directly through the App Store and paid Apple directly, using their credit card or other payment sources. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Further, many pointed out that the Poseidon project has yet to secure a single contract from purchasers for the treated water. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
Distribution Agreement New Jersey Law Contract Drafting (“Indirect” purchaser would lack antitrust standing). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
It is not readily apparent or plausibly alleged that an internet thief would be “drawn” by the efficiency of internet service any more than the average law-abiding purchaser of copyrighted content. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 2:19 pm
” The court went on to rule that enforcement of the tour participation agreement’s disclaimer provision with respect to the 93A claims “would be contrary to public policy” and to deny the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment as to the 93A claims due to disputed facts as to whether the tour operator actually provided all the services purchased by the plaintiffs. [read post]
