Search for: "Ingrid Wuerth"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2008, 2:17 pm
Paulus (Univ. of Göttingen - Law)Ingrid Wuerth (Vanderbilt Univ. - Law), The Enigmatic Captures ClauseComment: David J. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:56 am
Courts: The Case Against the State Department, Professor Ingrid Wuerth's timely and insightful article. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am
At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth surveys the Court’s merits cases and pending petitions on foreign relations and national security law. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
Briefly: At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth looks at how the Solicitor General’s recommendations in invitation briefs have fared recently in foreign relations cases and concludes that “it appears that the Court does not treat foreign relations cases as presenting an exceptional need to follow the views of the SG on whether to grant or deny certiorari. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 10:56 am
In addition, we hope to have comments on the book from a number of distinguished contributors, including our own Ken Anderson along with Harlan Cohen, Andrew Kent, Jenny Martinez, Jeremy Rabkin, and Ingrid Wuerth. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth discusses last week’s opinion in Bond v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum continues, with posts by Ingrid Wuerth and Beth Stephens. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: A Response to Professors Anderson, Rabkin, and Martinez
27 Jul 2011, 2:24 pm
We are very grateful to Roger Alford, Ken Anderson, Harlan Cohen, Andrew Kent, Jenny Martinez, and Ingrid Wuerth for the keenness of their insights, the generosity of their praise, and the gentleness of their criticisms. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:56 am
The new magazine includes other valuable reading, including: “International Human Rights Law: An Unexpected Threat to Peace,” an edited text of the Boden Lecture delivered by Ingrid Wuerth, who holds the Helen Strong Curry Chair in International Law at Vanderbilt University. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:07 am
Sachs, in which the Court is considering whether an American woman can bring a lawsuit in U.S. courts against the Austrian national railroad for injuries that she suffered in Austria; Ingrid Wuerth analyzes the oral arguments at Lawfare, concluding that the Justices “seemed strongly inclined to hold for OBB and reverse, but they proffered several potential reasons for doing so. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
” I’d also like to express my gratitude to Professor Ingrid Wuerth of Vanderbilt Law School for providing a response to the piece. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
• Donald Childress – Pepperdine School of Law • Sarah Cleveland – Columbia Law School • Anthony Colangelo – SMU Deadman School of Law • Susan Farbstein – Harvard Law School… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Ingrid Wuerth provides a fascinating analysis of the FSIA that explores the challenges the DNC lawsuit faces. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
Ingrid Wuerth discusses the grant at Lawfare, concluding that “the case is likely to be of broad significance for FSIA litigation in part because it has been more than two decades since the Court directly addressed the statute’s commercial activity exception” and because it will “contribute to the Roberts Court’s growing legacy of significant foreign relations-related cases. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth anticipates the Court’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
” And at Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth notes that the Court’s ruling “left for another day” questions relating to “claims with less tangible injuries such as the misappropriation of trade secrets and other data or intellectual property-related actions, some of which may prove difficult to analyze under the Court’s gravamen test. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
And to the extent that these issues under the ATS must be resolved via federal common law, as Ingrid Wuerth proposes, it suggests how and why that federal common law might take account of both the jurisprudence of these tribunals and traditional federal common law principles in crafting rules applicable to these cases. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Although somewhat less clear, the decision also tends to undercut the claim (made most notably by Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth in a recent article in the Harvard Law Review) that the Supreme Court is “normalizing” foreign relations law – that is, treating it the same way that it treats ordinary issues of domestic law. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:23 pm
See Ingrid Wuerth, Foreign Official Immunity Determinations in U.S. [read post]
