Search for: "Institute for Wildlife Protection v. US Fish and Wildlife" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2022, 10:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
For example, a tribe might seek to contract with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to operate a wildlife refuge, with the National Park Service to manage a park or monument, or even with the Bureau of Reclamation to operate a federal dam. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In 2011, the Fish and Wildlife Service lists the Pacific walrus as endangered or threatened. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Johns Riverkeeper and the Public Trust Environmental Law Institute of Florida sued JEA in 2007 over more than 200 instances of sewer overflows since 2001. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection announced today. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection announced today. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Our interns, Mitchell Beebe, Elena Botts, Kayla DeAlto, Austin Max Scherer, Teddy David, Jamie Jang, Kenneth Boggess, and Julia V. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
Francis also refers to an Ontario private member’s bill that would deny anyone convicted of a terrorism offence a fishing, wildlife or driver’s licence, health insurance benefits, social assistance and social housing, Ontario Disability Support benefits and workers compensation; a child of a convicted terrorist would be considered a child in need of protection. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
However, when it came to assessing damages, Kinko’s argued that it was acting as an agent of the professors’ college since “Section 504(c) provides that the court ‘shall remit statutory damages … where an infringer believed and had reasonable grounds for believing that his or her use of the copyrighted work was a fair use …, if the infringer was (i) an employee or agent of a nonprofit educational institution…. [read post]