Search for: "Insurance Company v. Sea" Results 61 - 80 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For the women raped years ago, the rape SOLs were short then, and the Supreme Court has made it impossible to give them a second chance at criminal prosecution under Stogner v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:55 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
  The Judge considered himself bound by the decision of Mr Justice Morison in Company X v Company Y, an unreported decision of July 2000, having found that it was not obviously wrong. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
These new lawsuits join several actions launched against private fossil fuel companies for climate impacts in recent years: Luciano v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El 26 de abril de 2011, Reliable y Universal Insurance Company (Universal) presentaron una demanda impugnando la confiscación. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
In 2013, he supported the retail chain Hobby Lobby in the company’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that employers provide their female employees with health insurance that includes access to certain forms of birth control; by a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court upheld the full 10th Circuit’s ruling for the company. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am by Jeffrey May
The Antitrust Division announced charges against Jeffrey Glazer, the former chief executive officer of generic pharmaceutical company Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Jason Malek, the former president of the same company. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:30 am by Christina Phillips
Acadia Insurance Company.1 Lakeshore brought suit against its insurer for breach of its contract to insure the sailing vessel, the Hailie & Matthew, and against any resulting lost earnings. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joe Consumer
Workers often battle insurance companies for years to get the surgeries, prescriptions and basic help their doctors recommend. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
  Such a benefit could be excluded if, in the opinion of BP or its insurers, the death resulted from, amongst other things, the engineer’s wilful act, default or misconduct. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  In the guise of preventing a “safe harbor,” the court put entirely at sea the last five years of preemption involving generic drugs. [read post]