Search for: "Interest of R.C."
Results 61 - 80
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the court struck down R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) on its face, on equal protection grounds. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
In re M.D., 38 Ohio St.3d 149 (1988) (The Supreme Court of Ohio will consider constitutional challenges to the application of statutes despite clear waiver in specific cases of plain error or where the rights and interests involved my warrant it.) [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
… Legislative measures proposing to amend R.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:28 am
See R.C. 5321.01. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am
Their compensation was alleged to be $10.00 for each acre leased to Appellees plus a 1% working interest in all wells subsequently placed on those leased acres. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:48 am
It will be interesting to see if it will. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
The bank has a property interest in any check it pays out. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
These rates are determined as prescribed by R.C. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
Due process is flexible and adjusts to the weight of the interests involved. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
” The code sections implicated here are R.C. 4112.02(A), which makes employment discrimination on the basis of a person’s sex unlawful, and R.C. 4112.01(A)(2), which defines employer to include “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:19 pm
R.C., involved the biological parents of a fourteen (14) year old boy each seeking to be designated as the parent of primary residence approximately ten (10) years after entering into a consent order resolving all issues of custody between them. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 5:08 am
On the heels of my blog entry from earlier this week addressing the issue of parenting time with the other spouse's significant other comes the recently unpublished (not precedential) decision from the Appellate Division in R.C. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am
[An interesting case, decided under an Ohio statute.] [read post]
6 May 2018, 7:45 pm
., R.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:35 am
Two judges dissent: Federal courts have recognized initial-interest confusion, and we should recognize it too. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:48 am
In an interesting opinion, the Ohio Supreme Court recently upheld a state tort reform statute that limits punitive damages to three times compensatory damages among other provisions. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
R.C. 4141.282 imposes various procedural requirements, of which the naming of interested parties is one. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
On June 25, 2013, MERS assigned all of its interest in the mortgage to JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (JPMorgan Chase). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
IRS announces revocation of certain R.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
At issue in this case is whether a trial court’s denial of an appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw due to a conflict of interest is a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4) and, if so, whether the motion was properly denied in this case. [read post]
