Search for: "International Electronics Inc v. Human Electronics Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:09 pm
The Board compared the claims to the dynamic-display electronic securities trading claims in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
The Board compared the claims to the dynamic-display electronic securities trading claims in Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To address these and other concerns, the Labor Department has joined other agencies like the Internal Revenue Service increasingly is challenging employers’ treatment of workers as exempt from FLSA and other legal obligations as independent contractors or otherwise. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The key case on originality in Canada is CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
Yesterday’s decision in Mastermine Software, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Steve Tuttle, director of communications for Taser International Inc., holds the X26c stun gun in 2004 at the company’s headquarters in Scottsdale, Ariz. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Panopticon, Data Manifest(o)ations Rights Info, The Election and Human Rights The Privacy International Blog has a post “Hiding in plain sight – political profiling of voters. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]