Search for: "J SQUARED, INC." Results 61 - 80 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 5:21 am by Brent Wieand
Provider Name Provider City Abuse Icon ASBURY HEALTH CENTER PITTSBURGH Y BARNES-KASSON COUNTY HOSPITAL SUSQUEHANNA Y BROOKSIDE HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER ROSLYN Y COLONIAL PARK CARE CENTER HARRISBURG Y CROSS KEYS VILLAGE-BRETHREN HOME COMMUNITY, THE NEW OXFORD Y GINO J MERLI VETERANS CENTER SCRANTON Y GROVE AT NEW WILMINGTON, THE NEW WILMINGTON Y GUARDIAN HEALTHCARE AT TAYLOR TAYLOR Y HARMAR VILLAGE CARE CENTER CHESWICK Y HOMESTEAD VILLAGE, INC LANCASTER Y MANOR AT PENN… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the year's worst in government transparency. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 7:27 am
That lies squarely with the leadership whose choices and ideological risk aversion has brought current conditions to this point. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If social media are "the modern public square,"[127] the law may constitutionally treat them (at least as to certain of their functions) the way physical public squares can be treated.[128] The New Jersey Supreme Court's rationale for adopting a public access rule much like the one the California Supreme Court adopted in PruneYard seems largely apt here: The private [shopping mall] property owners in this case … have intentionally transformed their property… [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The complaint was filed on behalf of a class of investors who purchased the company’s shares between July 6, 2020 (the day the company’s deal with J&J was announced) and March 31, 2021 (the day that the news reports about vaccine contamination at the company’s facilities first began circulating). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Norwood Realty, Inc., the letter of intent contained language that was explicitly binding.[46] The court held the letter of intent fell into the first category: Here, the intent of the parties to be bound by the letter of intent is not left to inference from the terms of their agreement but is twice expressly stated in prominent parts of the letter of intent. [read post]