Search for: "J. P. v. S. S. and C. S."
Results 61 - 80
of 3,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:17 pm
568/20, J v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:19 am
J. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:26 pm
You may already be familiar with the keyboard shortcuts for copying text (Ctrl/Command+C), pasting text (Ctrl/Command+V), or undoing a task (Ctrl/Command+Z). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:26 pm
You may already be familiar with the keyboard shortcuts for copying text (Ctrl/Command+C), pasting text (Ctrl/Command+V), or undoing a task (Ctrl/Command+Z). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
Mukasey, and William P. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
There is no conflict between the relief requested by Donald J. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lundbeck A/S, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
The court rejected these arguments and found that under the Act, non-inventors only have derivative rights that have an original source, claimed through a qualifying human inventor under sections 7(2)(b) or (c). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Session 3: Federalism John C. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
EU On 21 December 2023, the CJEU issued judgement in the case of Krankenversicherung Nordrhein (C-667/21). [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:22 pm
Regis, P. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 738, at p. 740). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Manaster and Daniel P. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Ranges’ and Oakley’s statement is, of course, demonstrably false. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The EDPS here referred to the judgment in Case C-70/88 Parliament v Commission, which held that the Court must ‘be able to maintain the institutional balance and, consequently, review the observance of the Parliament’s prerogatives when called upon to do so […] by means of a legal remedy’ (para. 23). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
