Search for: "J. R.C. A." Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
As long as the kirpan remains a symbol and is neither designed nor adapted for use as a weapon, laws such as R.C. 2923.12 are wholly inapplicable. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
 Three immigration concepts are mentioned in R.C. 2943.031:  “naturalization,” “exclusion from admission” (now called “admissibility” or “admission”), and deportation (now called removal). [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am by MBettman
R.C. 2945.371(J) bars statements made during that evaluation from use against the defendant for determination of guilt; however, it does not completely bar the prosecution or defense from calling the evaluator as a witness. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am by MBettman
Wogenstahl, 134 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2013-Ohio-164, 981 N.E.2d 900, ¶ 2 (O’Neill, J., dissenting). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am by MBettman
Individual political subdivision employees can still be found liable under other sections of R.C. 4112.02 that expressly impose liability, such as the aiding-and-abetting provision of R.C. 4112.02(J). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Joe Koncelik
The ten year tax abatement in R.C. 5709.87 has been on the books for twenty years. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by MBettman
Dreyer’s testimony about Harris malingering was improper evidence of consciousness of guilt under R.C. 2945.371(J). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
Hanning, Timothy J., Johnson, Jing Han and Steven C. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am by MBettman
The Court agreed, finding that even if an agent’s doing business in Ohio could satisfy R.C. 2307.382(A)(4), Auto-Owners did not act as agent of Oeding and J&R when it instituted an investigatory hold on Fraley’s truck. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
Feb. 5, 2014) (Carr, J., concurring in the judgment, with Hensal, J., agreeing on this score) (some paragraph breaks added) — and generally quite correctly, it seems to me: I concur in judgment only on the basis that I would conclude that the individual right to bear arms contained in the Second Amendment extends to motor vehicles…. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
A lot of things happened last week – so much that our usual wrap-up search last Friday took over three hours, which is more than twice as long as normal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ashby Donald and others v France (Judgment of 10 January 2013) the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]