Search for: "J. T. v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
Officially, the federal government calls Presidents' Day "Washington's Birthday" and at the time of its original enactment in 1879 (20 Stat. 277) it was celebrated on February 22 as a holiday for federal employees in the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Forty-one States, two Territories, and the District of Columbia now ask this Court to reject the test formulated in Quill. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Arab Bank, PLC, Docket No. 16-499, J. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
Moran, Leslie J. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 5:45 am
Sprigman said he believed that the Dastar v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:12 am
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: El-Shifa Pharm. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 5:49 am
Matthew J. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2015) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
As of now, nineteen states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex couples to marry, and a rapid-fire set of recent federal court rulings suggests that there is no end in sight. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
It was obvious that such arms are "commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes," which is the Supreme Court's rule from District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
L.J. 347-374 (2010).Stack, Nicholas T. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Columbia Broadcasting System, a case that established that "[c]rimes and torts committed in news gathering are not protected by the First Amendment" (61 AD2d 491, 494 [1st Dep't 1978]). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
(Kennedy, J., concurring). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
On 25 April 2024, Collins Rice J delivered a decision on damages for the successful claimants in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 956 (KB). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Richard J. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:55 pm
District Court ruled in Taitz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
Pruetz (argued), Michael T. [read post]
