Search for: "J. v. E."
Results 61 - 80
of 8,816
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Donald J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
By Eric J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Some of the first remanded cases went to the District of Oregon, where they landed in front of Judge Robert E. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Small, Joseph J. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Before former President Donald J. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
Post, at 3 (Higginson, J., dissenting). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
28; R. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
J. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Jill E. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Jill E. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
When can a lawsuit be voluntarily dismissed and not be refiled in Tennessee? [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Merrill & Kristin E. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
In Hotchkiss v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
In Palkon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
But Judge J. [read post]
