Search for: "JACKS v. JACKS" Results 61 - 80 of 4,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by Josh Blackman
At Lawfare, Jack Goldsmith (no relation to Jack Smith) and Tom Koenig offer a wonky breakdown of the Court's order. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
On my left: the edge of the off-ramp, a modest guardrail, and a fifty-foot drop. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
” After an appeals court decision gave Special Counsel Jack L. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am by Bob Ambrogi
” That fight went all the way to the Supreme Court, resulting in 2020 in a watershed ruling for public access to primary legal materials, Georgia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385;  R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 4:04 am by News Desk
Sargento, Part #23602 Deep V Shredded Monterey Jack Cheese Pack Size 500/0.5 oz. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am by Eric Fruits
These stations rightly saw CATV providing “out of market” signals as competition for viewers and advertising, as discussed in Carter Mountain Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Related Lexicon Entries Legal Theory Lexicon 010: Deontology Bibliography Jack M. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 10:41 am by Tom Smith
Yet that was a core part of the Supreme Court’s precedent on presidential immunity in Nixon v. [read post]