Search for: "JOHN DOE RETAILER" Results 61 - 80 of 1,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 12:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Kagan opinion was joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
It is worth remembering that it is the retailer that controls the price of both the original and the copy. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Retail Royalty has successfully shooed away two other bird marks via the TTAB: see here and here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by Howard Knopf
Indeed, it would be surprising if they do not do so.It’s too early to speculate about what Allarco will attempt do and what the Court might let it do about the 50,000 John Doe Customers or the now added John Doe Suppliers and how their interests will be represented if things ever get anywhere near that far.HPK [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:45 pm by Denis Stearns
In May, FDA alerted sprout growers and retailers that a seed supplier, Caudill Seed Company of Kentucky, was withdrawing all alfalfa seeds with a specific three-digit prefix. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm by pgbarnes
Does this incident say anything about the employment practices of America’s largest retail chain? [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Aaron Kaufman
” The post Does Cosmetics Regulation Need a Makeover? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe d/b/a Gnarly Sporting Goods Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00900-RLY-TAB File Date:    Friday, June 29, 2012 Plaintiff:     Indian Industries, Inc. d/b/a Escalade Sports Plaintiff Counsel:     Charles Johnson Meyer, William A. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:13 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the logo shown immediately below, for "clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops and tops," under Sections 1, 2, and 45, finding it to be "primarily an ornamental feature of the goods" that "does not function as a trademark for the goods. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 5:43 pm by John W. Arden
The trade group has said that the settlement is “unfair” and "does virtually nothing” to protect customers and address retailers’ concerns about credit card swipe fees charged by Visa and MasterCard. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:08 am
Moreover, just because goods are within or support the same structure does not mean they are related.As to registrant's retail store services, applicant's goods are not the type of goods that are sold in retail stores, and there was no evidence that they are so sold.Purchasing Conditions: The Board found that applicant's goods, by their very nature, are necessarily selected with care by purchasers familiar with the source of the products. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:32 am
 Speakers are our good friends Johanna Gibson & John Noble. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
But the 9th Circuit reversed the decision in 2008 and remanded, holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply to copies of works produced abroad. [read post]