Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC"
Results 61 - 80
of 887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
New Prime, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. 15-866Issue: (1) What is the appropriate test to determine when a feature of a useful article is protectable under section 101 of the Copyright Act; and (2) whether, in determining a copyright registration’s validity, a court should give any judicial deference in addition to the statutory deference articulated in 17 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am
Howard and Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 6:59 am
On August 6, a group of three individual plaintiffs represented by Judicial Watch, Inc. filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against California’s Secretary of State seeking to block the provisions of SB 826, which was signed into law in September 2018 and provides that: By December 31, 2019, every publicly traded company on a major securities exchange (e.g. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
(relisted after the November 8 and 15 conferences) The post Relist Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-483. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 pm
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
NAACP, 18-588 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 8th, 9th and 10th Circuits hold; and (3) whether the portion of Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
EDT Location Judicial Watch Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Midwesco Enterprises, Inc., the Supreme Court held that this Ohio provision imposes an “impermissible burden on commerce” when applied to non-residents, forcing the out-of-state corporation involved there to the choice of either appointing a resident agent in Ohio for service of process or remaining subject to suit in Ohio in perpetuity. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
King Cole Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
Why was the Plaintiff Health Management Associates, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
I normally try to have Relist Watch written up by Wednesday after the court issues its order list. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
This edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference tomorrow, Thursday, June 10. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ March 25 conference. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. [read post]