Search for: "JUNES V. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 28,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:43 pm
The trial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
United States, Concepcion v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:47 pm
State of New Mexico (10th Cir., June 8, 2017) (affirming dismissal of 1983 and certain equal pay and whistleblower claims, reversing dismissal of whistleblower claim against one of the defendants in his official capacity, and remanding violation-of-privacy, wage discrimination, and whistleblowing claims) ERISA Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
” See State Farm v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:46 am
Almond v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:45 pm
We previously noted the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
On June 9, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sykes v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:18 am
United States of America) (Mexico v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:45 pm
June 1996 - Classic TyposFrom Thomas V. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:42 am
JUDICIAL: BARK, CASCADIA WILDLANDS, OREGON WILD, & WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
Delta Airlines (10th Cir., June 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Delta Airlines on Ghogomu's Title VII and state-law claims) Labor Unions *United Steel Union No. 348 v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
In June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
On June 3, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
June and US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:27 am
Kelt, Jr., a United State Magistrate in Houston, discovered "this bit of testimony given by the young widow in the case concerning the fracus" in State of Texas v. [read post]
