Search for: "Jackson v. Outlaw" Results 61 - 80 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2019 the Russian State Duma voted to approve the first reading of two bills which would outlaw fake news and using the internet to express disrespect to society, the government, the state’s official symbols or in the Constitution in an obscene or irreverent way. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 27 and 28 and 30 November 2018 Nicklin J heard the privacy trial in ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Pinsent Mason’s Outlaw Blog has discussed the challenges of implementing equal opportunity monitoring. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
We watch a Court willing to allow the internment of Japanese citizens during World War II evolve into the champion of civil rights that outlawed racial segregation in schools in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
City of Jackson approach, to extend a law to cover “disparate impact” claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am by SHG
  At its core, Judge Browning’s view is reminiscent of Justice Robert Jackson’s quote from Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
Notables of the civil rights movement seated in the Supreme Court to hear challenge to Section V of the Voting Rights Act including John Lewis, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
Senator Vasconcellos, who wrote the Medical Marijuana Program Act, put it before the State Legislature, and got it passed, says he is… …deeply concerned that in the nine years since we passed SB 420, certain people have evidently been advocating a marked misinterpretation of … SB 420 – with regard to whether ‘making a profit’ is somehow not permitted for medical cannabis providers under state law.7 As Senator Vasconcellos stated in his letter: It was certainly… [read post]